The annual winter micromouse contest was held at Millenium Point in Birmingham by the University of Central England on Saturday November 19th 2011. Unfortunately, I was not able to attend this year but I gather everyone had a great day. I have managed to gather some results and the finals maze though…
The overall results table looks like this:
Competitor | Place | Competition | Category |
Stephen Pithouse with SLINKY | First | Line Follower Finals | Junior |
Jonathan & Ewan Luke with SCORPION 3D | Second | Line Follower Finals | Junior |
Bernard Grabowski with WHS | First | Line Follower Finals | Senior |
Duncan Louttit with DASHED | Second | Line Follower Finals | Senior |
David Hannaford with MINI | Joint Third | Line Follower Finals | Senior |
David Hannaford with NOSEY | Joint Third | Line Follower Finals | Senior |
Peter Waller with CHEDDARBYTE | First | Non Contact Wall | Senior |
Bernard Grabowski with VITO | Second | Non Contact Wall | Senior |
David Hannaford with WHS | Third | Non Contact Wall | Senior |
Derek Hall with MOUSE X | First | Maze Solver | Senior |
Jim Chidley with PICONE TURBO | Second | Maze Solver | Senior |
Tim Foden with FAT CAT | Third | Maze Solver | Senior |
Ken Hewitt with DEE | First | Time Trials | Senior |
Martin Barratt with D-WHIZ | Second | Time Trials | Senior |
Tim Foden with FAT CAT | Third | Time Trials | Senior |
While the record of score times looks like this:
MazeSolver:
EntrantMouseName | handler | Score |
Mouse X | Derek Hall | 17.61 |
FAB 1 | Derek Hall | 24.24 |
Mouse X2 | Derek Hall | 25.29 |
PicOne Turbo | Jim Chidley | 32.5 |
Fat Cat | Tim Foden | 32.77 |
Isambard II | Martin Barratt | 42.55 |
PICone | Jim Chidley | 46.62 |
Microbot | Jim Chidley | 88.47 |
Kaasjager | Coen Roos | 95.19 |
Wall Follower:
Cheddarbyte | Peter Waller | 23.59 |
Vito | Bernard Grabowski | 25.42 |
E-Rat-Tic | David Hannaford | 37.14 |
Lefty | Ken Hewitt | 46.56 |
McGuin | Duncan Louttit | 56.66 |
There Yet? | Stephen Pithouse | 68.21 |
Kitty | Martin Barratt | 73.92 |
Time Trials:
Dee | Ken Hewitt | 6.07 |
D-Whiz | Martin Barratt | 6.51 |
Fat Cat | Tim Foden | 6.98 |
E-Rat-Tic | David Hannaford | 15.66 |
Cheddarbyte | Peter Waller | 16.88 |
PicOne Turbo | Jim Chidley | 23.33 |
In the Time trials – a fast run all the way around the outside of a 16×16 maze – the best times went to the purely mechanical Dee and D-Whiz. However, it is encouraging to note that Tim Foden’s Fat Cat put in a very respectable time. It should not be long before a ‘proper’ mouse is able to definitively beat the mechanical monsters.
In the maze solver contest, Derek Hall appeared to have mostly himself to beat although the time returned by Jim Chidley’s PICOne Turbo was looking good. Remember that the UK contest rules have a search time penalty so the score is a combination of the actual run time and the total amount of time taken, including exploration.
A look at the actual fastest runs is interesting:
Mouse | Handler | Best Time |
Mouse X | Derek Hall | 14.63 |
Mouse X2 | Derek Hall | 14.98 |
FAB 1 | Derek Hall | 15.49 |
Fat Cat | Tim Foden | 28.31 |
PicOne Turbo | Jim Chidley | 29 |
Isambard II | Martin Barratt | 35.22 |
Kaasjager | Coen Roos | 74.76 |
Microbot | Jim Chidley | 81.9 |
Derek’s MouseX and MouseX2 are very closely matched. The six-wheeled FAB1 is nearly as quick but, I believe, has not yet got the integrated turns and diagonals fully set up. FatCat is actually a bit faster than PicOne Turbo but clearly must have taken somewhat longer to actually search the maze. There may also have been touch penalties involved. I am not sure.
The maze, designed by Ken Hewitt, in which these results were obtained looked like this:
The two paths indicated were about the same length at 86 and 88 cells and should have given a straight-seeking mouse a good opportunity to show off. Depending upon how the pathfinder handles the goal though, a diagonal entry into the goal area can be a bit tricky and has upset mice in the past.
Derek Hall has uploaded video showing the runs of the maze solvers:
A number of photos have been contributed by Ken Hewitt and I would like to thank him, Tony Wilcox – the event organiser and David Hannaford for the data and details needed to write this post.
Since I was not there, feel free to correct any errors.
Pete.
The solver finals maze is actually the maze used at APEC 2002, the other mazes which were used for the heats and follower finals were modified version of this maze.
At APEC 2002 the winner was Ng Being Kiat with Min 3 with a score of 12.36 and a fastest run of 11.21 secs. I am not sure if the score is calculated the same way as in the UK so this may differ a bit.
One difference at the November event compared to the June competition was that the different classes were run individually so everyone was able to check out what was happening in the different events.
Thanks again to Tony and his band of helpers for putting on a great day.
RoboTIC 2011 Video
I linked your latest video into the main body.